The disappearance of Haleigh Cummings was overshadowed by the case against Casey Anthony. I followed both cases, but I did a lot more research and digging in Casey Anthony’s case than with Haleigh’s. At the time of both, I hadn’t gotten into reading blogs or comments or joined any message boards to talk about either case, but I now realize a lot has been said that I’ve missed.
I remember hearing about Haleigh’s case and was puzzled. I could believe that a kidnapping could occur with the stepmom (Misty Croslin) sleeping next to the child, if she were drinking, doing drugs, or even if she was a hard sleeper. I could also believe that a kidnapping was staged. I watched her “hypnosis” video and she was fighting being hypnotized. She wasn’t trying to recall anything. Since I haven’t read all that much on it since watching that hypnosis video, I can’t really give any solid theories. Misty Croslin is currently incarcerated on drug trafficking charges. She was caught on video, so there isn’t even a question of her guilt of those charges.
In the search of Murt, there was information that he lived in Putnum County (where Haleigh lived) at the time of her disappearance. There was a blog I came across accusing the “anonymous owner of Radionewzblog” of Haleigh’s disappearance. The author attempted to accuse the blogger of Radionewz.net, but all he did was reveal a back and forth conversation between Boyle and “others”. This back and forth conversation is rather damning if the accusations between Boyle and “others” are true.
Someone went through a LOT of trouble and spared no expense to stalk me. This drone was at the gate of my home. I had my suspicions that my phone conversations were somehow being repeated online, but this is a lot more creative than I had imagined.
So whoever(s) you are. Sorry this was confiscated today. Hope you didn’t leave any fingerprints on it!
You may have thought twice before using a drone in Florida had you been reading the news. Police have been restricted from using them, but apparently, rules don’t apply to you.
Your client continues to violate United States Federal Law H.R. 3402:
(1) Under the Federal Crime, we are preparing to seek Federal legal action and this immediate relief: (a) Cyber harassment, Cyber stalking, etc. in violation of the Women’s Violence Act, Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, H.R. 3402, titled “Preventing Cyber stalking” and numbered as § 113, §113(a)(3) provides that Section 223(a)(1)(C) applies to “any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet; Cyber-stalking and Cyber-harassment laws in violation of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 223(a)(1)(C) and § 223(h)(1)(B). (b) H.R. 3402 INCLUDES CYBER: Slander, Libel and Harassment.
Under Sec. 113. FEDERAL “Preventing Cyberstalking”: To strengthen stalking prosecution tools, this section amends the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C 223)(h)(1) to expand the definition of a telecommunications device to include any device or software that uses the Internet and possible Internet technologies such as voice over internet services. This amendment will allow federal prosecutors more discretion in charging stalking cases that occur entirely over the internet.
The Communications FEDERAL Act, at 47 U.S.C Section 223(a)(1)(C) has prohibited the making of telephone calls of the utilization of telecommunication devices “without disclosing (one’s) IDENTITY to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person at the called number or who receives the communications.”
The FEDERAL Communication Act provides for fines and imprisonment of up to (2) two years for violations.