Charles Peter Hackett rebuttal to dismiss and answer

Charles Peter Hackett’s sworn affadavit

image

image

image

image

Breakdown of comments:

  • I have evidenced in a previous post  the first 2 lies.
  • He calls Mari Gilbert a liar.
  • He adds, “I never had any conversation whatsoever with anyone.” This phrasing is specific to further a lie.
  • Again, he uses the phrase, “I never met nor had any contact whatsoever with Shannan.”

13-16: “Since I never Met Shannan Gilbert… she was never in my presence nor in my home“, “Since I never met nor was in the physical presence of Shannan Gilbert,” “Since I never met nor was ever in the presence of Shannan Gilbert,”

  • There is a change in the phrasing that is rather telling if you know what you’re looking at. He changes the phrasing of the wording of presence. The addition of the word “never” is designed to get the reader to put emphasis on it as fact and in some psychological way, it shows the author is trying to convince himself it is fact, as well. He obviously didn’t have his lawyer draft this on his behalf, and that gives us another insight on his psychology- he thinks he’s smarter than his lawyer and needs to be in control. Most people would have one sentence in place of the tired phrasing trying to convince himself and the reader.

18: “Sadly, the complaint…” “…I was never in her presence, never met her, she was never in my house and I did not cause her death.”

  • The first word, sadly, is about himself. It’s the fact that here he is, being asked to explain himself, and he finds that sad. He now removes Shannan Gilbert’s name with the less personal “her” in his last attempt to convince himself and the reader that he has nothing to do with anything.

19: “I never attempted to conceal the body of Shannan Gilbert as I never met nor was in the presence of Shannan Gilbert nor observed, concealed, or moved her body!”

  • Wow! He uses an exclamation point on this statement. He’s now yelling at the reader. In case you didn’t get it from 13-19, he “never met nor was in the presence of Shannan Gilbert”. This exclamation shows his obvious frustration. 

21: “The events complained of took place in May 2010!”

  • Here’s another aggravated statement pointed out by an exclamation point. Yes, it is known the events took place in May 2010, but Mari Gilbert filed within the statute of limitations, so it holds NO bearing on any point Hackett is trying to make. 
  • Underlines the word never, again, to convince the reader (and himself). 
  • “The so called loss…” wow, just wow.
  • “The so called negligent acts…”
  • 22(D): apparently the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Causes of action are notso called“.
  • “…I have never had any contact whatsoever with Shannan Gilbert.” More words to reiterate lies.

Lisa G. Newman
Notary Public State of NY
widow of Michael Newman (2008)

Barbara Hackett’s sworn affadavit

image

image

Caroline Hackett’s sworn affadavit

image

Michael Dougherty’s interview with the Hackett family

image

image

image

Gus Coletti’s sworn affadavit
image

Barbara Brennan’s sworn affadavit
image

Elanore Canning’s sworn affadavit
image

Thomas Canning’s sworn affadavit
image

—————————————————————————–

Hackett is well aware that I have had these documents for some time now, and he knows that I have evidenced his lies. I wonder what new lies he will come up with next…

—————————————————————————–

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

————————————————

UPDATE: April 26, 2013, 12:40 pm

Since I’m being called a liar AGAIN, I will show some of the exhibits in support of John Ray’s rebuttal to dismiss. I was given the file by John Ray, not JS as is the latest misinformation being put out. I have it all, but I’m not showing it all.

Take a peek:
image

image

image

image

image

image

Advertisements

29 thoughts on “Charles Peter Hackett rebuttal to dismiss and answer

  1. Cheryl says:

    Who Actually SAID that Shannan was in Hackett’s home? I’m not clear on that. I know he retracted lying about the phone calls (none of which makes sense) – but- I THINK Shannan being in Hackett’s home is rumor.
    There’s something odd about the calls too. I don’t necessarily believe he made them just that they came from his number. But WHY doesn’t this man spit it out? He’s guilty of obstruction. Drag his azz to court.

    • mysterymom7 says:

      Exactly, who said Shannan was in his home? HACKETT DID… in his statement! When someone intends to pursue a lie, they offer information that was never asked of them. Simple as that. He elaborated on what was initially stated. It’s covering his ass BEFORE it needs covering, which is why he made the phone call to Mari.

  2. mm7. can i ask when you heard dr. hackett say that and to whom? did you witness this statement with your own eyes and ears?

    “always question whats in front of you” ???
    and think of the source of your info.

  3. right. hackets written word states he did not have any contact whatsoever with shannan. and every one’s elses’ that he never said that he did. it is the truth. where pray tell is bruce A’s statement?

    thats ok, we can’t all be intelligent. you take a lunatics word even after its been proven that he is lying. now you are 100% responsible for posting your own lies. without regard of the ripple effect.

    we reap what we sow.

  4. Exactly, who said Shannan was in his home? HACKETT DID… in his statement! ~ mm7

    maybe if you read it a few more times… keep trying.

  5. Cheryl says:

    I don’t want you to be mislead. Not after all you’ve been through. To my knowledge, Shannan visiting Hackett has never been verified. According to 48 HRS., the last “credible” witness who saw Shannan alive – after Gus Colletti – was Barbara B.
    The amount of rumor and stalking on the internet concerning this case is significant.

  6. Cheryl says:

    Who was the Main one that led you down the wrong path to begin with?

  7. more eloquently said than i, cheryl.

    but, by all means, mm7, do share the sworn testimony by any person that states dr. hackett told them that he had ever seen shannan, let alone the rest of the bs. see, all i see is the sworn testimony, stating the exact opposite. keep playing with joey. you are two peas in a pod.

  8. oh of course, the testimony is from joey. i didn’t have time to read the whole pos. but just a few paragraphs and i know it will be dismissed. filled with bs that can easily be proved wrong. and you claim to have dissected it? im wasting my time with an idiot.

  9. Cheryl says:

    John Ra, the attorney for Mari Gilbert, who is deposing Hackett, stated, that; the last CREDIBLE witness to have seen Shannan alive – after Gus C. – was Barbara B.
    John Ra, has had several investigators on this case; and he, if anyone, would know.

  10. Cheryl says:

    You’ve been played hard. That’s all it is. Probably let it go.

    • mysterymom7 says:

      Oh… quite the contrary… he left a comment I have not approved (nor will I) that gave just enough info to do some “real sleuthing” (his words, not mine).

  11. Cheryl says:

    I meant John RAY
    Sticky KEY!!!

  12. Cheryl says:

    ALSO. Are you saying that John Ray left a comment?

  13. Cheryl says:

    Got It. Neva mine

  14. Cheryl says:

    He made that statement on 48 HRS Mysteries.

  15. Cheryl says:

    Pretty easy to verify.

  16. Cheryl says:

    The last credible witness was Barbra (in semi-quoted above). Ray never mentioned Hacket has having seen Shannan.
    It’s hearsay. If is was said, it was not said by anyone (he) considered credible.

  17. Barbara H. says:

    honey you told me ther was nothing left on the internet that could prove you ran a home office!!!! your’e such a dope.

  18. CYNTHIA WISE says:

    How did you illegally obtain copies of papers not filed yet with the court system?

    I am reporting you to the FBI!!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s