US Federal Cyberstalking laws


Your client continues to violate United States Federal Law H.R. 3402:

(1) Under the Federal Crime, we are preparing to seek Federal legal action and this immediate relief: (a) Cyber harassment, Cyber stalking, etc. in violation of the Women’s Violence Act, Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, H.R. 3402, titled “Preventing Cyber stalking” and numbered as § 113, §113(a)(3) provides that Section 223(a)(1)(C) applies to “any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet; Cyber-stalking and Cyber-harassment laws in violation of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 223(a)(1)(C) and § 223(h)(1)(B). (b) H.R. 3402 INCLUDES CYBER: Slander, Libel and Harassment.

Under Sec. 113. FEDERAL “Preventing Cyberstalking”: To strengthen stalking prosecution tools, this section amends the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C 223)(h)(1) to expand the definition of a telecommunications device to include any device or software that uses the Internet and possible Internet technologies such as voice over internet services. This amendment will allow federal prosecutors more discretion in charging stalking cases that occur entirely over the internet.

The Communications FEDERAL Act, at 47 U.S.C Section 223(a)(1)(C) has prohibited the making of telephone calls of the utilization of telecommunication devices “without disclosing (one’s) IDENTITY to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person at the called number or who receives the communications.”
The FEDERAL Communication Act provides for fines and imprisonment of up to (2) two years for violations.


5 thoughts on “US Federal Cyberstalking laws

  1. Worried About You says:

    Hi. u address this starting with “your client”

    Is this a copy of a letter or lawsuit u sent to CPH’s attorney?

    What about all what you u wrote on this blog and on LISK and on WS about CPH and now Michael Doughtery. How is that not cyberstalking them what you are doing?

    • mysterymom7 says:

      There is a link to the left regarding laws in place to protect a blogger’s right to publish information. Please take the time to read if you have further questions on what is/isn’t cyberstalking.

      CPH had been talked about on WS for 16 months before I ever joined. Michael Dougherty was named in Newsday when he was with Mari Gilbert on May 1, 2011.

  2. Union Gal says:

    I FOIL requested the FOIL requests.

    This is what they sent me among other things;

    Suffolk County Department of Law
    FOIL Appeals Officer
    Christopher M. Gatto
    County Attorney’s Office
    P.O. Box 6100
    Hauppauge, NY 11788

    October 27, 2012

    Re: appeal of 911 calls, records, etc.

    Dear Mr. Cohen,

    Upon receipt of your letter dated October 22, 2012, I contacted the Committee on Open Government (COOG) to inquire about the validity of your request, as I used their sample appeal form shown on their website to be sure I had the correct information.

    According to the COOG, I had followed the appropriate steps by giving a detailed description of requested records to the Suffolk County Police Department F.O.I.L. Officer, Central Records Division, Janine Kelleghan. A copy of the denial letter from the F.O.I.L. Officer at Suffolk County Police Department is not required to appeal their decision to the County Attorney.

    Although it is not a valid request, it is not an excessive request, therefore, I’ve attached a copy of the list of requested records as well as the letter of denial from the Records Assessor at the Suffolk County Police Department. I trust this will expedite a decision.

    Since the time frame to answer an appeal is ten business days from receipt of an appeal, and the request for more information is invalid, I would respectfully request an answer within five business days from receipt of this letter.

    To expedite the process, an answer can be emailed to the email address below. Records may also be emailed to the email address below. I trust the law will be upheld and a release of records or denial is a reasonable request within five business days from receipt of this letter.

    I appreciate your cooperation on this matter.


    Cristin Kennedy


  3. Union Gal says:

    so apparently your info is now a matter of public record.

    • mysterymom7 says:

      So apparently… you’re a lying fucking sack of shit. I posted that letter on WS and left my info out, but Susie got my address, email and phone number for you, it seems. You two make a great pair! Does she give good happy endings?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s